Sunday, December 30, 2007

TOP 10 NON DRUG BASED ADDICTIONS

I thought this was really kind of informative. Found this on stumble.

 

Substance Abuse Trends

People struggling with substance abuse turn to the internet for help and information every day. Whether searching for signs of an addiction, addictions treatment resources, or addict relapse prevention, the ratios within these search statistics help us understand the nature of substance abuse today.
The following table highlights the most common substances found in online searches for addictions to legal drugs. How does this knowledge challenge your assumptions? How can you use this information to prevent addictions in your community?

 

Top 10 Addictions - Legal Drugs:

1 GAMES 1,326,314 *

2 SEX 505,353

3 INTERNET 231,922

4 LOVE 230,544

5 PORN 178,975

6 GAMBLING 131,336

7 FOOD 114,377

8 SOLITAIRE 103,755

9 COMPUTER 62,420

10 CARBOHYDRATE 61,407

“Honorable Mentions” - The Next 10:

11 DIET 53,849

12 CHURCH 45,482

13 CAFFEINE 32,722

14 SHOPPING 32,680

15 SUGAR 32,372

16 PAIN 25,964

17 MASTURBATION 25,182

18 PANTYHOSE 23,324

19 RELATIONSHIP 18,587

20 PANTY 18,185

* Estimated annual searches across all search engines in phrases including 'addiction', 'addictions', 'addict', 'addicting' and 'addictive'.

Addictions to games, sex, pornography and gambling account for a large share of addictions-related online searches. While many of these searches may spring from harmless situations, the pattern of abusing substances to cope with stress is a more common social issue than addiction to one specific substance.

Several bizarre addictions highlight the strange range of habit-forming acitivites reported by tens of thousands of people, inslcuing addictions to shopping, panties, soliatire, diets and computers.

Additional topics in this series:

Source:

http://www.clearhavencenter.com/addictions-research/special-features/top-10-non-drug-based-addictions.html

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Noise Annoys and essay by Mark Vernon

I can’t tell you how much I miss having peace and quiet. Especially in seattle it was so nice to go hiking in the mountains and just enjoy the sounds of nature, coming up on a stream that you can hear, what seems like miles, and the sounds of birds, wind rustling the leaves, and if it’s not windy then …. Nothing … it was the one true joy that I had. Going hiking in the mountains! I can’t wait to do it again. Too bad there aren’t a lot of jobs in the woods.

I haven’t contributed in a while and this is not going to change that since “I” didn’t do it.

But it’s a great essay that I have to share with all of you. And notice that I resisted the urge to "texify" it by saying ‘y’all’.

I don’t think the pictures are going to show up on the blog, so feel free to click on the link to follow it.

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7078882.stm

Noise annoys

Girl puts finger to lips

By Mark Vernon

Silence is golden, but it's under threat in a world where as business booms and prosperity looms, noise is growing.

A composer recently described how orchestras find it impossible to play a piece of her music. The problem is not that she has written too many notes. Neither is it that she requires unusual musical instruments. Rather, it is that in the piece she has written 25 seconds of silence.

The pause is intended to build tension. But when they see it, she said, conductors baulk. They fear that musicians wouldn't know what to make of it, and worse, that audiences wouldn't be able to take it. Over such a long period of time, a concert hall would be plunged into near panic.

When the last episode of the Sopranos was broadcast this year, finishing with a sudden cut to black and silence, many baffled viewers assumed there was a fault with the signal.

Lewis Hamilton blocks out noise with fingers in ears

Lewis Hamilton is moving to Switzerland for a quieter life

We live in a society with a growing aversion to the emptiness that comes not just with silence but, more generally, with a fear of not knowing what to say.

Consider what might mark someone out as your best friend. For some, it is the person who they don't see for some time and yet, when they do, it is like they have never been apart. Perhaps more commonly today, in the era of mass mobile communication, a best friend is someone with whom you are in constant contact, texting or messaging as automatically as breathing.

But there was a time when it was said that a true friend is someone with whom you can sit in complete silence, without a hint of embarrassment or need to fill the space.

Silence as sin

Then there are politicians. For them, to be caught off guard in front of the cameras could result in nothing less than the curtailing of a career. Alastair Campbell famously filled the political day with the "grid". He argued that 24-hour news loathes a vacuum and that if he did not fill it, an editor or producer would. That is undoubtedly true.

But as Douglas Hurd has observed, on some subjects silence might not only be a good policy, it might be more honest. "Silence is regarded as a sort of sin now, and it has to be filled with a lot of gossip and sound bites," he has written.

Anti-noise placards

Some people are ready to defend their right to quiet

Not knowing what to say can be social death, as well as political. Everyone can remember a time when they got into a tangle over something, and then - horror of horrors - they then said the wrong thing; they were in a hole and could not stop digging. It can be amusing to watch.

Probably the most famous episode of the classic comedy Fawlty Towers was built around Basil Fawlty, played by John Cleese, trying not to talk about the war. "Don't mention the war!", he endlessly repeated and mentioned nothing but, because he could not just shut-up.

Research suggests that there is a connection between the wealth of a society and the levels of noise within it. A project at Sheffield Hallam University tracked the levels of noise in UK for a number of years. It is rising - in Sheffield city centre, for example, by 3 decibels in 10 years.

Firework hell

A report from the Noise Association this month says that sound levels on the Piccadilly Line of London's underground can exceed that of a jet taking off at Heathrow Airport. And complaints about noise from domestic premises rose almost fivefold in the twenty years up 2005 in England and Wales, according to the UK government.

Then there is Bonfire Night and fireworks. "All the surveys show that people are concerned about noise," Val Weedon, National Coordinator for the UK Noise Association says. "The fireworks issue is an example of that. Thousands of people contact their MPs about it getting out of control."

Plane flies over homes

Planes are loud but so is public transport

Now, for all that we can hate it, it might be that we use noise and chatter to protect ourselves. There are people who can't stop talking and would panic if they did.

And then there are iPods and Walkmans that create a bubble of noise to keep the outside world out. Some users might even be listening to Simon and Garfunkel singing their song, Sound of Silence: "People talking without speaking, People hearing without listening."

But does this matter? I think it does. I know a monk. He spends the majority of his day not talking. The aim is that he lives in quietude punctuated by periods of noise - when in chapel or talking with his brethren.

A more usual way of life is exactly the opposite, for most people live in noise and occasionally seek out silence.

Speech is shallow

For a monk, not talking has an intrinsic value, since it is then that he is able to listen, notably to the "still, small voice of God". To put it in secular terms, silence is necessary in order to perceive and understand things.

As Thomas Carlyle wrote: "Under all speech that is good for anything there lies a silence that is better. Silence is deep as Eternity; speech is shallow as time."

That, then, might be the most profound worry about rising noise levels in our society: it stops us from thinking. Or to put it differently, the next time you don't know what to say, don't be alarmed. Try saying nothing.

Mark Vernon is the author of What Not To Say: Finding the Right Words at Difficult Moments.

The Music Man

Let me just start off by saying that this whole fiasco, or another way to say it is débâcle, or even another way to say it is, disappointment. This is how I truly feel under the anger and the betrayal of trust. I am speaking of the Jena Six case. The case that really broke out in September when black America took it upon themselves to inflate the population of this sleepy little Louisiana town of 3,000 to 10,000+. For a demonstration in support of six teenage boys that on the surface seemed to be suffering an injustice at the hands of a biased system. The bias in this case seemed to be based on race and not facts, because this being the deep south, and it being Louisiana, the state that openly popularized corruption in the late 20th and early 21st centuries! Ah ha, au contraire, there where some pretty substantial facts that the folks organizing the demonstrations didn't think we, the public, were privy to either through omission or by blatantly lying to us, the public. Now the folks that I believe share the blame for this distasteful lack of judgment for preying on sympathies of the public for perceived racial injustices are the notorious SOB's, (that's actually the name of the club they are in), they are in order of notoriety...

Rev. Jesse Jackson - Who is a low life, hypocritical son-of-a-bitch, bible thumping, adulterous, racists, and let's not forget a classic example of a type A narcissist. He is the founder of the Rainbow/PUSH collation, whatever the hell that is supposed to stand for anymore. This man is from another era. A time when he was in the right place at the right time. He rode the coattails of a truly great man. He never actually did anything great himself. It's not like he's a great diplomat or negotiator he's just good at inciting a mob. Just like his friend and protege(?) business associate...

Rev. Al Sharpton - is just as slimy as his former boss and compatriot. He does likes to march into a situation and twist and construe the facts to the point of them being lies and will even step over the line to get his way.

Both of these gentlemen belong to the same club. They are both past their expiration dates. Meaning that when Dr. King, was assassinated and the civil rights movement was embraced by American mainstream as a just cause. As things started to change, abet slowly, since you cannot just stop and reverse course overnight, this is still an ongoing process, mainly an educating one for the rural folks since this is where most of this residual racism seems to be, i.e. Jena (pop. 3,000). However this is not necessarily a blog so much about racism as it is self-righteous public speakers taking advantage of small folk for their own personal gain. Alas i am getting to the heart of what it is that really chaps my hide in this situation.

Both of these guys organize a demonstration, and start to inflame racial tensions, insinuating, and exaggerating facts to fit the situation for their own personal glory, just so it'll look good as a bullet point on their resumes. And the public, yours truly included, believe's them. Yes, believe's that this town's d.a., judge, and police department, where in a conspiring to victimize these six young black men for beating the snot out of this white kid. Who more than likely hung the nooses. What the protest organizers seemed to forgotten to mention is that, they didn't beat him up at school right after finding out what had happened. No they jumped the kid, yes all six of them, almost like a gang, as he was leaving a gas station on foot. They put him in the hospital. The police did investigate the "noose" incident, and decided that charges where not warranted in this matter. Well, we all know, that all the police, d.a., and the judges like to do, is totally screw up innocent peoples' lives, right. That's all they live for. Seriously, how diluted have we become. I know we all agree that checks and balances for the judicial system seem to be going out of whack, however that is on the scale of whole system in large. But when you get down to the local level, the officials don't want to screw up the lives of six kids, especially if they are innocent!

Now for the article that sparked this rant on my soapbox, was about Mychal Bell. He was the one that the conviction got over turned on due to technicalities, well it turns out he was on probation for those prior run-ins with the law, he got thrown into jail due to violating the terms of his probation. Here is a quote(s) from his dad:

"He's locked up again, No bail has been set or nothing. He's a young man who's been thrown in jail again and again, and he just has to take it."

This is what the illustrious Rev. Sharpton had to say:

"We feel this was a cruel and unusual punishment and is a revenge by this judge for the Jena Six movement"

And one more quote from his dad,(last one):

"I don't know what we're going to do, I don't know how we're going to pay for any of this. I don't know how we're going to get through this."

Maybe you should ask your new friends Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to give you some money to help you through these rough times, and to help you become a better dad, since apparently you weren't involved in your son's life enough to know what kind of people he was hanging around with, or that he wanted blood for the noose incident.

Anyhow, this is the end of my rant for this edition. I don't normally get worked up over things like this, because usually we (the public) don't always get the whole story about a situation, like the McCann's and the daughter that disappeared in Portugal. That incident was picked up by the media and blown sky high, and for no other reason but for ratings, it was a slow news week. But what made me jump on the Jena six band wagon, was that it was almost a year later, and it was easy to grasp the hope that was being peddled for these kids, in the face of a grave in justice. Since almost a year had passed since the transgression in question, it seemed logical that the media would've had plenty of time to research the topic before just accepting what the Music man (men) had to say. That would be what they are getting paid for no? At least in the movie the Music Man came back and did the right thing.

The Article:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071012/D8S7K6680.html

 

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Ignorant idiots spouting racial insults

I’m coming out of Starbucks, after spending some time in there reading and enjoying a nice cup of joe before my run tonight. I start to head out to the bus stop and notice this ‘older’ guy, slightly balding. Sitting Indian style on the ground with a worn leather football in between his legs; he tries to beg for some money from another guy sitting on the bench. The guy on the bench pretty much tells him no. Well, it continues back and forth for a while. The guy on the bench is not letting it go, and the older guy, who now notice has most of his front teeth missing and is slurring his words together, is definitely not letting up. Something about alcohol inhibiting your better judgment, this continues back and forth to the point where voices are starting to rise and people are starting to look. Then the older guy utters like the ultimate racial epithet that a white guy can, ‘nigger’. You probably guessed it, the dude on the bench is black, and there are several of them around waiting on they’re various buses to come. This guy is so intoxicated that, he didn’t realize what he had just said, when the situation really started to get tense.

 

For reasons I can’t fully understand, I was so close to standing up and telling this guy off for saying what he did. It wasn’t just the word, but of course the context and his tone that really made this a potential powder keg.  This guy got me riled up about it as well, I was so close to just telling him what an ignorant and sad pathetic man, and it’s people like him along with Mr. Falwell, that unnecessarily poke and prod sensitive social areas. Instead of working on educating yourself, they are bitter and angry at people, and apparently over skin color. I wish I could make an excuse for this guy, about him being baited and drawn into this argument, but it was shameful to watch and witness.

 

I was really fuming about this all the way home. I cannot really understand why, but this guy really pissed me off. I hate, no, absolutely abhor intolerance. Especially when it’s based on something as superficial as skin color! And it’s people like him that keep perpetuating hate unnecessarily because they are bitter and want someone else to blame for they’re short comings. Since you really can’t blame an inanimate object for it, so… that’s enough for my soap box for the evening. Off to my run.

Monday, October 15, 2007

What would be the right ethical choices in situations?

           When I spent some time down in Franklin, I was a little bored, so I started to Stumble. The topic that I stumbled on was ethics. Some Moral Dilemmas and The Generalized Structure of Ethical Dilemmas. Most of the questions were fairly thought provoking. They made contemplate what would you possibly do in the position of protagonist. Some of these examples are fairly extreme. Some are easy to relate to, some are insightful in the sense that it makes you wonder, where does one’s right’s stop and another’s began. What powers does the government have in imposing moral superiority upon its citizens? It could even have you ponder which way you perceive your moral compass to be pointing to.

Let’s start off by defining what morals are which coincidently are very similar to ethics or ethical ideas. The Webster says

moral - 1 a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ETHICAL <moral judgments> b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior <a moral poem> c : conforming to a standard of right behavior d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment <a moral obligation> e : capable of right and wrong action <a moral agent>

That is the dictionary definition of the word and what it means. That does not really tell us anything. For that we will need examples. This first one was one that left me at a loss for words the first time I read it. It is a powerful and appalling scenario.

 

A Father's Agonizing Choice

You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and wants you to pull the chair from underneath him. He says that if you don't he will not only kill your son but some other innocent inmate as well. You don't have any doubt that he means what he says. What should you do?

 

Is this scenario so appalling because it uses the words “concentration camp”, these words tend to be associated with some of the worst atrocities that man is capable of, and thus incite powerful emotions. Of incredible brutality and pain, this is what it seems to do for me. I do not believe myself capable of doing what I perceive to be necessary in this scenario. I believe with a  fair amount of certainty that the guard would have to do it. I would not be able to bring myself to do the act of pulling the chair. It would probably be safe to say that I would be beaten by the guard, however, the life of one’s own child, I believe to be wrong. Which is to say that is one person, my son, worth the life of another innocent human being? And for no other reason than to satiate some guards blood lust. Just thinking about this scenario makes my stomach turn, in disgust. This is one of those scenario’s that you could never answer truthfully until the situation presented itself. Spending time in a camp would most certainly numb one’s self. It would more cause you to be and act like something that you are normally not as a free person.

 

 

Jean Valjean's Conscience, with some comments; see the 1998 movie, Les Miserables, with Liam Neeson, Uma Thurman, and Geoffrey Rush.

In Victor Hugo's Les Miserables, the hero, Jean Valjean, is an ex-convict, living illegally under an assumed name and wanted for a robbery he committed many years ago. [Actually, no -- he is only wanted for breaking parole.] Although he will be returned to the galleys -- probably [in fact, actually] for life -- if he is caught, he is a good man who does not deserve to be punished. He has established himself in a town, becoming mayor and a public benefactor. One day, Jean learns that another man, a vagabond, has been arrested for a minor crime and identified as Jean Valjean. Jean is first tempted to remain quiet, reasoning to himself that since he had nothing to do with the false identification of this hapless vagabond, he has no obligation to save him. Perhaps this man's false identification, Jean reflects, is "an act of Providence meant to save me." Upon reflection, however, Jean judges such reasoning "monstrous and hypocritical." He now feels certain that it is his duty to reveal his identity, regardless of the disastrous personal consequences. His resolve is disturbed, however, as he reflects on the irreparable harm his return to the galleys will mean to so many people who depend upon him for their livelihood -- especially troubling in the case of a helpless woman and her small child to whom he feels a special obligation. He now reproaches himself for being too selfish, for thinking only of his own conscience and not of others. The right thing to do, he now claims to himself, is to remain quiet, to continue making money and using it to help others. The vagabond, he comforts himself, is not a worthy person, anyway. Still unconvinced and tormented by the need to decide, Jean goes to the trial and confesses. Did he do the right thing?

 

Yes, it is taking responsibilities for your actions. The fact of the matter is that he still committed the original act, the robbery. Granted he had managed to slip away and reform himself. Now in a case such as this I don’t think it would be neither unfair nor unprecedented to take into account what he has accomplished and the good he has brought to his community. He does still have to pay the consequences for his actions. Maybe it could be up to the victim that he had wronged earlier to have a say in the decision. I think that the system would treat him very unfairly in the fact that, he has become an important member of this community out in the open, in a sense humiliated the system. So i don’t believe that the judge and the judicial system would be completely fair about the situation. We are a society based on rules, for us to be a civilized, we have to follow those rules and follow through with what we have decided to considered acceptable punishment. If we were to choose who these rules would apply to, it would start discontention in the ranks of people who felt they have been treated as unjust; we would then in turn start to have a break down of civilized society. However ever case is unique, we cannot use blanket justice, we should consider everything. We cannot take the conscience and common sense out of the judicial system.

·  A Callous Passerby

Roger Smith, a quite competent swimmer, is out for a leisurely stroll. During the course of his walk he passes by a deserted pier from which a teenage boy who apparently cannot swim has fallen into the water. The boy is screaming for help. Smith recognizes that there is absolutely no danger to himself if he jumps in to save the boy; he could easily succeed if he tried. Nevertheless, he chooses to ignore the boy's cries. The water is cold and he is afraid of catching a cold -- he doesn't want to get his good clothes wet either. "Why should I inconvenience myself for this kid," Smith says to himself, and passes on. Does Smith have a moral obligation to save the boy? If so, should he have a legal obligation ["Good Samaritan" laws] as well?

 

This comes down to the ancient law of, ‘do unto others, as you would have them do unto you’. The man does have a moral obligation to try and save the boy. Especially since there is no immediate danger to him, at the worst he will be slightly inconvenienced. Now when it comes to the legal side of it, some people have a tendency to become overzealous and hijacking situations like this and skewing the facts; whether it is feeding the mob misinformation or diverting the attention from their very own fallacy, by taking control of it and manipulating it and laying their version of moral superiority on an individual. When it has been shown time and time again no one is infallible. No matter how morally superior they think are, or have convinced those around them.

Should there be laws to force you into helping someone? You should help others if you can. It is very important for a spiritual well-being that you satiate your conscience as well. If you are not spiritual sound or at the very least, trying to become stronger spiritually, then you will turn into a miserable person; thus infecting those around you with your misery and unhappiness. It gives a great sense of contentment when you can make a difference in someone’s life. If one chooses to stay ignorant to this, then all you can do is pity them. One after all can not be forced to do the right thing, and it should not be forgotten that this man has ultimately himself, his own conscience, and answer to and God. We are a society, and as such, set standards that we expect people who participate in this society to live by, and if you don’t like those standards, and break the rules you will be punished accordingly. If you don’t like it, you are always welcome to leave.

 

·  The Last Episode of Seinfeld, not in Grassian.

The cast of Seinfeld, Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer, have a layover in a small New England town. They witness a robbery in broad daylight. The robber has his hand in his pocket, and the victim shouts that the man has a gun. As soon as the robber runs away, a policeman appears on the scene; but instead of pursuing the robber, he arrests Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer for having violated the new "Good Samaritan" law of the town. Since the four of them spent the time of the robbery making fun of the victim, who was fat, their role in the matter doesn't look good, and at their trial everyone who has ever felt wronged by them in the course of the television series testifies against them. They are convicted. Is this just? What were they supposed to do during the robbery? Should they have rushed the robber, just in case he didn't really have a gun?

This is a skewed view on what the intention of the law was. It was not intended for this. One cannot ask someone to voluntarily place their personal safety in jeopardy for the sake of someone else’s material objects. You cannot reasonably ask someone to be a hero. Not everyone has it in them, nor do they want to. For instance, when you are going through a Hazmat training course, they cover confined space rescue, one of the scenario’s that is covered is, if you have a coworker who is not responding in a confined space, it is says that you should enter after him. You don’ want to turn the situation into a multiple body recovery. Think, before you, yourself becomes the next victim. Ultimately it is unjust to hold a stranger. Ridiculing the victim wasn’t the best idea; however what else were they to do. It is they’re right to do it. Yea it is easier to shift the blame to the hecklers for the robbery, instead of just accepting the fact that it was bad luck. You can’t jail someone for hurting someone’s feelings. That’s starting to be a bit draconian, isn’t it now.

Jim has the responsibility of filling a position in his firm. His friend Paul has applied and is qualified, but someone else seems even more qualified. Jim wants to give the job to Paul, but he feels guilty, believing that he ought to be impartial. That's the essence of morality, he initially tells himself. This belief is, however, rejected, as Jim resolves that friendship has a moral importance that permits, and perhaps even requires, partiality in some circumstances. So he gives the job to Paul. Was he right?

 

Yes, he did the right thing. Loyalty is a very important part of life. Just because he is not as technically qualified as the other candidate does not mean that he will not be able to bring other qualities to this job. Since Jim already knows what kind of a person that Paul is he knows what to expect. Since there is a personal relationship there it has the potential to go either way. Assuming that both Paul and Jim have a good work ethic and when at work will work I the best interests of the company then there should be no problem. Professional is the name of the game. Now the unstated expectations of Paul are going to be higher than if the other candidate would’ve gotten the job, you have to trust in people. The data in this scenario is lacking, in that it doesn’t paint a complete picture and you have to make assumptions, and those assumptions will be based on your own personal morals. It get’s complicated.

 

 

 

Ultimately when it comes to doing what is ethically concept, it is an ambiguous term. Fortunately there is no right or wrong. It leaves it all up for discussion and the consensus of the public. But having good ethics and morals is a must, it thus requires you to be spiritually secure. Believe in the fact that God has a plan for you, you can not see what it is, and he knows the truth, he will love you regardless as long as you do the right thing.

Friday, October 12, 2007

GenXer's misinterpreted workplace "passion"

Dear Christine,

I am a 25-year-old dental hygienist. I have a great career with an excellent salary. I love what I do but I can't say that I'm 'passionate' about it. In fact, there is nothing that I do in life that I am passionate about. I don't have any activity or subject that excites me beyond a few weeks. Just because I have no passion, does that mean I have no purpose in life? How do I reach my inner passion?" -Purposeless, 25, Chicago

Dear Purposeless,

You are having trouble finding your "inner passion" because you are focusing on the buzzword: passion. This word gets a lot of airtime as the most popular career advice is "find your passion and you will be happy and successful." News flash: most people, whether in their 20s 30s or later in life, don't jump out of bed and run to work everyday. Sometimes, a job is just a job. True, some people really do love what they do for a living, but if you don't feel passionate about it that doesn't mean you have no purpose.

You said that you love what you do and are paid well, why isn't that good enough? It sounds to me like you are simply looking for a little more joy in your life which you can create without changing jobs or having a Eureka! moment of self-discovery. Become passionate about exploring the things that make you joyful - perhaps spending time with friends, doing something artistic, cooking, being outside, and so on. You say you do not have a single activity that interests you more than a week, but consider your expectations of an activity may be too high. Can you enjoy the simple things in life? Being passionate about something comes more from HOW you do things rather than WHAT you are actually doing. Or perhaps your passion is exploration and you are someone who will always try new things. What's wrong with that?

Your life purpose is not determined by the person who signs your paycheck. Your purpose in life is to learn lessons about yourself and your life - smell, taste, touch, see, feel and experience. If you are looking for life's purpose in a career, what do you think life is really about? If it was supposed to be about work, why are we born with the ability to fall in love, laugh, dance, travel, have families, connect with friends, celebrate holidays and birthdays?

Stop looking for your life's purpose in what you do. You absolutely have a purpose in life - and that is to live it! -Christine

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Politicians must really think we are dumb, or are we?

Today I was listening to NPR, it was the market watch program and I heard a sound bite of a senator ‘idiot’, can’t remember the name, it went like this, “want to know the nonpartisan answer as to why it didn’t happen, [I can’t remember what exactly], it because of the republicans.” Man, I wish I could remember and/or find the quote. However this is the meat of the quote that really stuck out to me. It just struck me as so absurd. That I couldn’t really just ignore it because it was made an effing senator! Sad, sad.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Dollar to collapse?(Interesting article)

Source: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/business/ambrosevanspritchard/july07/willtheusdollarcollapse.htm

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Ambrose has covered world politics and economics for a quarter century, based in Europe, the US, and Latin America. He joined the Telegraph in 1991, serving as Washington correspondent and later Europe correspondent in Brussels. He is now International Business Editor in London.

Dollar to collapse?

Posted by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on 12 Jul 2007  at 16:48 
Tags: Economics, dollar, World economy, Demographics, Currency markets

Disregard all hysteria. The ailing Greenback will not collapse this year, not in ten years, not in twenty years, not in half a century. There is no credible currency against which it can collapse. (Unless you count gold). None of the world's rival power blocs have the economic and demographic depth to challenge American dominance.

A stack of dollar bills
Built to last: the US dollar

Yes, we have a dollar rout on our hands. The markets have suddenly begun to discount a nasty crunch in the US as the subprime debacle spreads through the credit markets. The prospect of rate cuts by the Federal Reserve is drawing closer, knocking away the dollar's yield prop. Investors have switched reflexively to the euro as the default currency.

This cannot last. It assumes that Europe has "decoupled" from America and now has the umph to go it alone. German finance minister Peer Steinbrueck played to this illusion on Monday when he professed to "love the strong euro" - (directly contradicting testimony he gave to the European Parliament earlier this year).

Whether or not Germany is really that immune to an exchange rate of $1.38 to the dollar (Professor Peter Bofinger - one of the country's five "Wise Men" - insists adamantly that it is not), it is in any case a foolish error to treat Germany as if it were a proxy for the whole eurozone. In reality, it has become the nemesis of Euro-land. While the Teutonic Tiger is indeed springing back to life after a decade-long slump, it is doing so by conquering market share from the Club Med bloc in what amounts to a beggar-thy-neighbour shift within the euro-zone. This has a zero-sum flavour to it.

France, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Greece, and latterly Ireland are all facing very serious trouble. They are at or near the top of the cycle. Housing bubbles caused by ultra-low interest rates (geared for Germany, when Germany was down -- the dirty secret of EMU) are starting to burst. Club Med's share of global exports is collapsing.

Bernard Connolly, global strategist at Banque AIG and former head of economic research at the European Commission (the best informed euro-critic in the City, and the one most feared by Brussels), says Spain will face an outright "depression" by 2008-2009 and Italy will face an "Argentine crucifiction" until it is ejected, or chooses to escape, from the euro-zone.

How has this "divergence" happened? In a nutshell, Germany has gained 20pc in unit labour cost competitiveness against France, 30pc against Spain, and 40pc against Italy since the currencies were locked together in 1995 (EU data). It has done so by screwing down wages, while Club Med has done what it always does -- let rip on wages.

Or put another way, Europe's ancient nations have reverted to type, as they were always bound to do. The elapse of a decade has allowed this to go beyond the point of no return. How is Italy, for example, supposed to claw back lost competitiveness on this scale against low-inflation Germany? Yes, Italy did this in 1927 under the `lira forte' policy of Mussolini, but he was able to use Fascist powers to ram through a 20pc cut in wages. Try that in a democracy. It would take a severe recession to force down Italian wages enough to make a difference. The budget deficit would balloon. The national debt (108pc of GDP) would spiral upwards, setting off panic sales of Italian bonds. The policy would instantly defeat itself, even if it did not set off civil conflict - which it would. Italy cannot break out of this impasse unless Germany agrees to tolerate much higher inflation for the whole euro-zone. Berlin would sooner choke on Sauerkraut.

The longer the euro stays near $1.40, the more severe the coming crisis a year or eighteen months hence -- as the lagged effects of over-valuation turns boom to bust with even greater violence across Club Med. Sooner or later, the markets will twig in any case. The screams coming from southern Europe will be too loud to ignore. Worth noting that Goldman Sachs has begun to recommending "shorting" Italian and French bonds, expecting them to diverge further from German Bunds. This is exactly how the unravelling begins.

It will become obvious at some point that the euro-zone is just a glorified fixed-exchange rate system, not a sacred union. The euro is an orphan, stateless currency, lacking the mechanisms (a debt union, pension union, a shared treasury and fiscal transfers) that makes a currency union work over time.

Contrast that with the dollar, the currency of a nation forged by wars and the ancestral chords of memory (Lincoln's words) - all for one, and one for all. America is a country. (Again a Lincoln sentiment, but now a truism). That massive historical fact makes all the difference.

Ah, but there is the Japan, at last breathing again after its near-death brush with deflation. Now, I don't doubt that the yen will at some point snap back violently as interest rates (now 0.5pc) return to a semblance of normality. As soon as global risk appetite fades again, the yen carry trade will doubtless unwind - perhaps brutally as in 1998 - and some of that $500bn shipped overseas will come home.

That said, anybody who follows the rhythms of Tokyo's stock market must suspect that a sharp appreciation of the yen will cause the Nikkei index to plummet - bringing Japan's fragile expansion to a swift halt. The "Seven Samurai" exporters -Honda, for example, which earns 70pc of its revenues in America - will take a battering. As month after month of disappointing retail data this year keep showing, Japan lacks the demand growth to take the baton from America. Wages have fallen for the last five months in a row.

Japan is already the oldest society in the world, shrinking since 2005. The population peaked at 128m in 2005 and is expected to fall below 100m by the middle of the century. If - as expected - Japan's aging grannies and housewives raise the share of foreign assets in their portfolios from 3pc to 12pc over time, the yen must weaken further. It is the dying currency of a dying country -- albeit a most charming one.

Which brings me to China, a country that is growing old before it ever becomes rich. The working-age population peaks in 2015 - just eight years time. China then dives into the steepest demographic decline ever known by any nation in peace-time. As for China's current boom, you need only know three things so see where this is going: credit is being channelled for political purposes through Communist state banks that are not subject to market discipline; almost half of GDP is going on investment, leading to a glut of factories; return on that investment, measured by the incremental capital output ratio, is 4.4. Much of it is being wasted. Compare that to Japan (3.2), South Korea (3.2), and Taiwan (2.7) during their growth spurts. China is not going to take over the world economy, now or ever. The window will close shut before they get there.

No, the 21st Century will be the American century, just like the 20th Century. Americans may have to tighten their belts a bit after all the sins of Alan Greenspan and the Clinton-Bush debt generation. But the dollar will still be the world's reserve currency long after the euro has disappeared and the yen has been forgotten... Now, the Indian Rupee? Hhm. Another day.

Posted by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on 12 Jul 2007 at 16:48

 

What happens to Potter and crew after Deathly Hallows?

Spoiler alert, the following discuss and reveal important plot lines in the series. Don’t read if you don’t want to know.

I have just concluded reading the Harry Potter books, years 1 thru 7, I do have to say it was an amazing story to read. I will someday reread them. It was a well written and engaging story, of good and evil, loyalty, friendship, and morality. These are some answers to what happens after the story concludes and some questions answered about the last book, Deathly Hallows.

Your ''Hallows'' questions, answered!

Still stumped after finishing ''Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows''? We tackle some nagging queries

RE-CURSED Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort

By Adam B. Vary

SPOILER ALERT! The following article contains plot details about book 7. Read at your own risk.

How did Godric Gryffindor's sword get into the Sorting Hat after Griphook the goblin took it? —Amy
The same way it got from Dumbledore's office into Harry's hand in book 2 —because Neville Longbottom is a true (and brave) Gryffindor.

Why was Draco the rightful owner of the Elder Wand? How did that work against Voldemort? —Nick
Deep breath: When Draco disarmed Dumbledore at the end of book 6, the Elder Wand — won by the headmaster when he dueled Grindelwald — passed its allegiance to young Malfoy, not to Snape, whose ''murder'' of Dumbledore was prearranged and therefore not a defeat. Then Harry won Draco's wand at Malfoy Manor. So when Voldemort tried to kill Harry with the Elder Wand and Harry countered using Draco's wand, the two wands effectively canceled each other out. The Elder Wand realized it was attacking Draco's wand, refused to act against its master, and rebounded the Killing Curse back onto Voldemort. The Dark Lord never had a chance.

Who was the ugly baby crying in King's Cross that Dumbledore said couldn't be helped? —Andrea
The dead portion of Voldemort's soul that had been a part of Harry.

Why wasn't Kreacher freed when Harry gave him Regulus' locket? —Jenny
A locket isn't clothing.

Students at the new Hogwarts had to prove their blood status to attend. So how did Muggle-born Colin Creevey manage to stay? —Maddie
He didn't. Colin likely returned for the battle along with other members of Dumbledore's Army (alerted by their enchanted Galleons).

Voldemort's kin, the Gaunts, had kept the Resurrection Stone; Harry's ancestors held the Invisibility Cloak. Since those items' original owners were brothers, are Voldemort and Harry related? —Sara
Perhaps, but there's been so much intermarrying among wizard families that we suspect nearly everyone with magical blood is related to some degree.

Harry and Ginny's kids are all named after figures from their past. So what's the significance of Ron and Hermione's kids' names, Rose and Hugo? —Jen
Beats us. Because they have the same first letters as their parents' monikers? Or Rowling just liked the names? Or she's a serious Lost fan?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Editor's Note: This Associated Press story contains spoilers. If you'd rather not know what happens in "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," stop reading now.

LONDON, England (AP) -- Just because J.K. Rowling has stopped writing about Harry Potter and his friends and foes doesn't mean she has stopped thinking about them.

Rowling

"Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling thought of the idea on a train trip in 1990.

more photos »

She told fans Monday what she thinks happened to many of the book's characters after the final installment.

In a 90-minute live Web chat, she fielded some of the approximately 120,000 questions submitted by devotees. It was her first public comment since "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" -- the last book in the series -- debuted on July 21.

Rowling said she was elated to share with fans the secrets she'd been harboring since she conjured up the idea for the boy wizard during a train journey across England in 1990.

"It is great to be able to do this at last," she said. "I've looked forward to it for so long!"

"Deathly Hallows" sold over 10 million copies in its first weekend. All seven books in the blockbuster series have sold a combined 335 million copies worldwide. PhotoGallery: Fans wait for the big moment of release »

In the novel -- which centers on Harry's journey to kill Lord Voldemort, the most powerful dark wizard of all time -- the young wizard learns of three powerful magical objects called the Deathly Hallows that, when combined, will make their owner the Master of Death, meaning he or she accepts mortality without fear.

Don't Miss

Rowling said in the online chat the hallows were in part inspired by "The Pardoner's Tale," one of Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" about greed and death.

Rowling shared with fans, many of whom said they'd read the final book several times in the last week, where she imagines their favorite characters went after the series' conclusion.

SPOILER ALERT: Those who do not wish to know what happens to the characters after the book ends should stop reading here.

Rowling said the world was a sunnier, happier place after the seventh book and the death of Voldemort.

Harry Potter, who always voiced a desire to become an Auror, or someone who fights dark wizards, was named head of the Auror Department under the new wizarding government headed by his friend and ally, Kingsley Shacklebolt.

His wife, Ginny Weasley, stuck with her athletic career, playing for the Holyhead Harpies, the all-female Quidditch team. Eventually, Ginny left the team to raise their three children -- James, Albus and Lily -- while writing as the senior Quidditch correspondent for the wizarding newspaper, the Daily Prophet.

Harry's best friend Ron Weasley joined his brother, George, as a partner at their successful joke shop, Weasley's Wizard Wheezes. Hermione Granger, Ron's wife and the third person of the series' dark wizard fighting trio, furthered the rights of subjugated creatures, such as house elves, in the Department for the Regulation and Control of Magical Creatures before joining the magical law enforcement squad. The couple had two children -- Rose and Hugo.

Luna Lovegood, Harry's airily distracted friend with a love for imaginary animals who joins the fight against Voldemort in the Order of the Phoenix, becomes a famous wizarding naturalist who eventually marries the grandson of Newt Scamander, author of "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them."

And what Muggle, or non-wizard, song would have been played at the funeral of Albus Dumbledore, the most brilliant and talented wizard the world had ever known?

"Surely 'I Did It My Way' by Frank Sinatra," Rowling told her fans, referring to the song "My Way," written by Paul Anka but popularized by Sinatra, among other singers.

advertisement

As the chat wrapped up, Rowling thanked readers for their loyalty to the series.

"What can I say? Thank you so much for sticking with me, and with Harry, for so long. You have made this an incredible journey for Harry's author." E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

Friday, September 21, 2007

Ten predictions about climate change that have come true

Now, I have to say I am looking for ten predictions that didn’t come true. Makes you wonder, because I can remember hearing a lot of crazy and wild speculative prophecies back in the 90’s about what was going to happen if we didn’t reign in all of the pollution that we were spewing out. Granted they have started to come true, I am curious as to what hasn’t happened according to Chicken Little.

 

 

Source: http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article1984755.ece

From

 

June 25, 2007

Here are the hard facts about global warming that everyone should know, compiled for Times Online by internationally acclaimed writer, scientist and explorer Tim Flannery, author of The Weather Makers: Our changing climate and what it means for life on earth

 

Background

·         The Weather Makers: Our Changing Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth

·         The Weather Makers: extract 1

·         The Weather Makers: extract 2

Background

·         £4bn to stop big drought killing heart of Australia

·         More hunger and hurricanes on the way

·         Darfur conflict warning of climate change peril

·         Help, I'm stuck in a climate change conundrum and trying to stay cool

·         When it comes to climate change, I'll take a small bet that Pascal was right

Ten predictions made by climate scientists that have come true (or are becoming true)

1.      That the Earth would warm as more CO2 was put into the atmosphere (Svante Arrhenius in 1893)

2.      That we'd begin to see noticable changes to Earth's climate by around 2000 (some IPCC scientists ).

3.      That sea-level would start rising

4.      That Earth's Ice would start melting rapidly (James Hanson)

5.      That hurricanes would increase in intensity (this one goes back to Alfred Russel Wallace in 1900)

6.      That species would start going extinct as a result of climate change.

7.      That Australia would start drying out (Hadley Centre scientists)

8.      That tropical diseases would increase

9.      That food crops would be adversely affected

10.  That the CO2 would begin to acidify the ocean

The ten biggest changes to the weather wrought by climate change

1.      Shorter winters

2.      Less runoff into dams and reservoirs in many regions of the world

3.      More violent and longer hurricanes

4.      Less chilly nights

5.      Less predictable seasonal conditions

6.      Less snow

7.      More heat waves

8.      Less rain in many regions at various seasons

9.      More severe storms in the North Sea and parts of the southern Ocean

10.  Generally warmer conditions

The ten places in the world / animals in the world most endangered by global warming

1.      The glorious Cape Botanic province in South Africa, particularly the succulent Karoo flora.

2.      Amphibians everywhere (a third of all species are already gravely endangered or extinct.

3.      Coral reefs

4.      Species on mountaintops (many populations are already extinct.

5.      The tundra

6.      The Arctic Ocean

7.      The Antarctic Peninsula

8.      Australia - where the drying trend is already precipitating a new wave of declines and extinctions.

9.      The Amazon, where drying will affect forests and rivers

10.  The boreal forests, here pest infestations are destroying vast areas of trees.

Tim Flannery is an internationally acclaimed writer, scientist and explorer. As a field zoologist he discovered and named more than thirty new species of mammals, including two tree-kangaroos. Sir David Attenborough described him as being ‘in the league of the all-time great explorers like Dr David Livingstone’. His latest book, The Weather Makers: Our changing climate and what it means for life on earth , is published in paperback by Penguin

 

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Some great youtube videos!!

These are some of my favorites off of youtube.



















Equal justice for the Jena six

The Jena Six, are there police and the DA not doing they’re jobs? The 3rd circuit court of appeal in Lake Charles tossed out the aggravated battery conviction. Five of the six kids were tried as adults. The appeals court gave a five sentence three paragraph ruling!! Now it it’s that obviously wrong why did the original judge allow it?

 

Why is this not a hate crime? Why have the police not caught and charged the students that instigated and baited those six. The students that hung the three nooses from those black kids sat under tree? Why have they not filed charge against them? Yes we can not allow vigilantism to go unpunished, but there needs to be justice. Even and fair! Not lopsided, this case reeks of something and it’s not right. If this was reversed, as in they were white assailants; this would be a federal case under the hate crime statute.

 

Also the fact that these kids shouldn’t have been tried as adults for this charge really shows the DA is overreaching. But he used the attempted murder charge that he drummed up to get him into the adult court, and then reduced it. Why didn’t the judge let them move it out of adult court? Gotta love the good ole’ south!

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Why is it so difficult for Americans to 'discuss' immigration?

This topic has been difficult for me to find a starting point. I started out trying to talk about another aspect. However I kept coming back to this one word, immigration. I feel that I have to discuss this one first before I can tackle any of the other topics that spider web out from here. So here goes…

 

            My biggest aggravation with this issue is why nobody brings up the cause of why this has gotten so out of hand, you know the root cause. This was businesses trying to save a buck and there fore hiring immigrants for various reasons. Businesses therefore influenced the governments, both Mexican and American, to enact uncontrollable, short sighted and expensive immigration policies. I was doing some research on the internet about what this topic and came across a great study from the Center for Immigration Studies titled Flawed Assumptions Underlying Guest worker Programs. here is another study, The Impact of Agriculture Guest Worker Programs conducted by The National Foundation of American Policy. Now I haven’t personally read both of these studies all the way through, so I don’t know what kind of a bias is in them, or even if it’s partisan. There is a lot of underlying emotion that is going to inevitably come out. This touches so many of us in ways that we haven’t thought about. I’m getting the vibe that there is a lot of resentment brewing underneath the surface of this country. True that all of these workers, which are coming mostly from Mexico, are illegal aliens, they are already here. We should have addressed this issue back in the 1980’s when it originally came up.  

            So now we have over eight million workers that have established themselves here, and started families. Poor people are good at that. What do does the government do? Deport the parents that have come here illegally? Then you’ll have a fiasco like that kid back in the 1998 that was getting deported to Cuba, to rejoin his father. Would we just give the INS a blank check so that we could assure success? Do we separate the children from their parents thus unnecessarily increasing the burden on our social services, which the parents didn’t pay for in the first place? You and I both know that this is not the answer. If you didn’t understand why this is so emotionally moving for people, then maybe you can appreciate it now. Anything that involves blood is going to cloud most rational judgment.

            When it comes to the migrants that had to wait in line to come here from all the other countries that aren’t mexico. You know the guys that didn’t sneak across the border in the dead of night. They are extremely resentful of the policies that let this happen, and rightfully so. It’s really not fair that some people had to play by the rules and the a lot of other people didn’t. However it’s not all the immigrants faults’. I believe most of the blame lies with the government, not all of it mind you. We the people need to step up and take responsibility for what we have not wanted to thus far. Now that we are being forced to talk about this issue and deal with it, I believe there is a certain amount of anger and frustration in the fact that it is being forced upon on us by terms that we don’t necessarily agree with. It’s the terms that are being imposed upon us that we are resentful of by far. I know I like to deal with challenges on my terms, who doesn’t.

We all hate to be forced into things, unfortunately now we have to talk about this and try to check our emotions at the door. I don’t pretend to know anything which I discuss here. I just give my two cents. I do know that this is something that needs to be addressed soon, because it is only going to get worse. We can’t change the past and we can’t predict the future, we can however influence it. We need to learn that we cannot control or plan for everything. The road to hell is paved with the best of intentions.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

The way to win people over

Source: http://www.westegg.com/unmaintained/carnegie/win-friends.html

How to Win Friends and Influence People

This is Dale Carnegie's summary of his book, from 1936


Table of Contents

1.     Fundamental Techniques in Handling People

2.     Six Ways to Make People Like You

3.     How to Win People to Your Way of Thinking

4.     Be a Leader: How to Change People Without Giving Offense or Arousing Resentment


Part One

Fundamental Techniques in Handling People

  1. Don't criticize, condemn or complain.
  2. Give honest and sincere appreciation.
  3. Arouse in the other person an eager want.

Part Two

Six ways to make people like you

  1. Become genuinely interested in other people.
  2. Smile.
  3. Remember that a person's name is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language.
  4. Be a good listener. Encourage others to talk about themselves.
  5. Talk in terms of the other person's interests.
  6. Make the other person feel important - and do it sincerely.

Part Three

Win people to your way of thinking

  1. The only way to get the best of an argument is to avoid it.
  2. Show respect for the other person's opinions. Never say, "You're wrong."
  3. If you are wrong, admit it quickly and emphatically.
  4. Begin in a friendly way.
  5. Get the other person saying "yes, yes" immediately.
  6. Let the other person do a great deal of the talking.
  7. Let the other person feel that the idea is his or hers.
  8. Try honestly to see things from the other person's point of view.
  9. Be sympathetic with the other person's ideas and desires.
  10. Appeal to the nobler motives.
  11. Dramatize your ideas.
  12. Throw down a challenge.

Part Four

Be a Leader: How to Change People Without Giving Offense or Arousing Resentment

A leader's job often includes changing your people's attitudes and behavior. Some suggestions to accomplish this:

  1. Begin with praise and honest appreciation.
  2. Call attention to people's mistakes indirectly.
  3. Talk about your own mistakes before criticizing the other person.
  4. Ask questions instead of giving direct orders.
  5. Let the other person save face.
  6. Praise the slightest improvement and praise every improvement. Be "hearty in your approbation and lavish in your praise."
  7. Give the other person a fine reputation to live up to.
  8. Use encouragement. Make the fault seem easy to correct.
  9. Make the other person happy about doing the thing you suggest.